<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HP Quality Center vs. IBM Rational Quality Manager</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beteoblog.com/2009/04/20/hp-quality-center-vs-ibm-rational-quality-manager/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beteoblog.com/2009/04/20/hp-quality-center-vs-ibm-rational-quality-manager/</link>
	<description>Sustainability (not only) for Packaged Software Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:25:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest</title>
		<link>http://www.beteoblog.com/2009/04/20/hp-quality-center-vs-ibm-rational-quality-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-1319</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 07:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beteoblog.com/?p=417#comment-1319</guid>
		<description>I used first RQM version and now I have seen extremely good changes in 2012. Can we say the same for HP QC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used first RQM version and now I have seen extremely good changes in 2012. Can we say the same for HP QC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter P</title>
		<link>http://www.beteoblog.com/2009/04/20/hp-quality-center-vs-ibm-rational-quality-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 01:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beteoblog.com/?p=417#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>By the way, I do appreciate your taking the time to write up that comparison.  It is quite helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, I do appreciate your taking the time to write up that comparison.  It is quite helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter P</title>
		<link>http://www.beteoblog.com/2009/04/20/hp-quality-center-vs-ibm-rational-quality-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 01:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beteoblog.com/?p=417#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>Hello Serge, (or anyone out there who&#039;s listening). 

It&#039;s now 2011 and it would certainly be great to have an update.  Quality Manager&#039;s initial release was in Oct 2008 and is currently in version 2.0  It must surely have added a few new features by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Serge, (or anyone out there who&#8217;s listening). </p>
<p>It&#8217;s now 2011 and it would certainly be great to have an update.  Quality Manager&#8217;s initial release was in Oct 2008 and is currently in version 2.0  It must surely have added a few new features by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilker</title>
		<link>http://www.beteoblog.com/2009/04/20/hp-quality-center-vs-ibm-rational-quality-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>ilker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 22:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beteoblog.com/?p=417#comment-897</guid>
		<description>Hi Serge,

I am a test manager at an airline company. We are investigating Quality center and quality manager 2.0 nowadays. What do you think has changed regarding this paper of yours ? Can quality manager turn out to be the leader ? Do you have a revised version of the comparison table ?

Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Serge,</p>
<p>I am a test manager at an airline company. We are investigating Quality center and quality manager 2.0 nowadays. What do you think has changed regarding this paper of yours ? Can quality manager turn out to be the leader ? Do you have a revised version of the comparison table ?</p>
<p>Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
