<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Integrating HP PPM with HP Quality Center – As Simple as It Looks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beteoblog.com/2008/09/30/integrating-hp-ppm-with-hp-quality-center-%e2%80%93-as-simple-as-it-looks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beteoblog.com/2008/09/30/integrating-hp-ppm-with-hp-quality-center-%e2%80%93-as-simple-as-it-looks/</link>
	<description>Sustainability (not only) for Packaged Software Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:49:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Markus von der Heiden</title>
		<link>http://www.beteoblog.com/2008/09/30/integrating-hp-ppm-with-hp-quality-center-%e2%80%93-as-simple-as-it-looks/comment-page-1/#comment-1219</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus von der Heiden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beteoblog.com/?p=101#comment-1219</guid>
		<description>Hi Martha,

it a good starting point to evaluate if your QC view is application centric or project centric. the hazzle is, that HP ALM even in the last version does&#039;nt support 1:n entity relationship. so one request type can be mapped to one project. this approach is based on HP&#039;s best practices to view the Quality Center szenarios from a application driven approach. If you have a project centric approach there&#039;s a tool called HP ConnectIT that even makes it easier to map all necessary elements and entities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Martha,</p>
<p>it a good starting point to evaluate if your QC view is application centric or project centric. the hazzle is, that HP ALM even in the last version does&#8217;nt support 1:n entity relationship. so one request type can be mapped to one project. this approach is based on HP&#8217;s best practices to view the Quality Center szenarios from a application driven approach. If you have a project centric approach there&#8217;s a tool called HP ConnectIT that even makes it easier to map all necessary elements and entities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dieter Steiger</title>
		<link>http://www.beteoblog.com/2008/09/30/integrating-hp-ppm-with-hp-quality-center-%e2%80%93-as-simple-as-it-looks/comment-page-1/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>Dieter Steiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beteoblog.com/?p=101#comment-918</guid>
		<description>Martha,
we have done several successful integrations linking HP PPMC to QC over the past years. Basically what you can do is synchronize defects and requirements in QC with defect and requirement/change requests in PPMC, respectively. We have found that defect synchronisation often makes more business sense than synchronizing requirements - but this depends entirely on your setup and processes.
From a simple technical point of view, you can use the standard integration delivered by HP and you normally would not need any other applications or tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martha,<br />
we have done several successful integrations linking HP PPMC to QC over the past years. Basically what you can do is synchronize defects and requirements in QC with defect and requirement/change requests in PPMC, respectively. We have found that defect synchronisation often makes more business sense than synchronizing requirements &#8211; but this depends entirely on your setup and processes.<br />
From a simple technical point of view, you can use the standard integration delivered by HP and you normally would not need any other applications or tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martha Dempsey</title>
		<link>http://www.beteoblog.com/2008/09/30/integrating-hp-ppm-with-hp-quality-center-%e2%80%93-as-simple-as-it-looks/comment-page-1/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha Dempsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beteoblog.com/?p=101#comment-910</guid>
		<description>I am interested in reviewing any information on the success of integrating HP PPM and HP Quality Center ongoing implementation.  What specific steps were taken and were there any other application tools integrated in this effort?

Sincerely,
Martha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested in reviewing any information on the success of integrating HP PPM and HP Quality Center ongoing implementation.  What specific steps were taken and were there any other application tools integrated in this effort?</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Martha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

