<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PPM &#8211; Gartner Causes Confusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beteoblog.com/2007/11/16/ppm-gartner-causes-confusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beteoblog.com/2007/11/16/ppm-gartner-causes-confusion/</link>
	<description>Sustainability (not only) for Packaged Software Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:46:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ITIL, PRINCE2, PMI – Just Paper Tigers? /// beteo</title>
		<link>http://www.beteoblog.com/2007/11/16/ppm-gartner-causes-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>ITIL, PRINCE2, PMI – Just Paper Tigers? /// beteo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beteoblog.com/2007/11/16/ppm-gartner-causes-confusion/#comment-312</guid>
		<description>[...] between project business and IT operations. Although IT service management (ITSM) as well as project portfolio management (PPM) are already implemented and operated with a good process maturity level, the list of problems is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] between project business and IT operations. Although IT service management (ITSM) as well as project portfolio management (PPM) are already implemented and operated with a good process maturity level, the list of problems is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Application Management Reduces SAP osts &#124; beteo blog</title>
		<link>http://www.beteoblog.com/2007/11/16/ppm-gartner-causes-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Application Management Reduces SAP osts &#124; beteo blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beteoblog.com/2007/11/16/ppm-gartner-causes-confusion/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>[...] Portfolio Management A consistent Project Portfolio Management (PPM) which considers, evaluates, and releases all changing activities from a business as well as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Portfolio Management A consistent Project Portfolio Management (PPM) which considers, evaluates, and releases all changing activities from a business as well as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Project Portfolio Management - Miniguide &#124; beteo blog</title>
		<link>http://www.beteoblog.com/2007/11/16/ppm-gartner-causes-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Project Portfolio Management - Miniguide &#124; beteo blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beteoblog.com/2007/11/16/ppm-gartner-causes-confusion/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] the articles &#8220;PPM - Gartner Causes Confusion&#8221; und &#8220;Project Portfolio - Hype and More&#8221; we covered the issue of the nonspecific [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the articles &#8220;PPM &#8211; Gartner Causes Confusion&#8221; und &#8220;Project Portfolio &#8211; Hype and More&#8221; we covered the issue of the nonspecific [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demian Entrekin</title>
		<link>http://www.beteoblog.com/2007/11/16/ppm-gartner-causes-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Demian Entrekin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beteoblog.com/2007/11/16/ppm-gartner-causes-confusion/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>It is my view that PM and PPM must merge into an integrated discipline, and what we&#039;re seeing now is the transition from PM trying to go up and PPM trying to go down.  

This centralization, normalization and standardization of project data and process is inevitable.  It will just take a little time.  As an correlate, it really took the CRM market about 10 years to get its act together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my view that PM and PPM must merge into an integrated discipline, and what we&#8217;re seeing now is the transition from PM trying to go up and PPM trying to go down.  </p>
<p>This centralization, normalization and standardization of project data and process is inevitable.  It will just take a little time.  As an correlate, it really took the CRM market about 10 years to get its act together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPM – Alibi Without Impact Analysis &#124; beteo blog</title>
		<link>http://www.beteoblog.com/2007/11/16/ppm-gartner-causes-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>PPM – Alibi Without Impact Analysis &#124; beteo blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beteoblog.com/2007/11/16/ppm-gartner-causes-confusion/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] &amp;nbsp      &#171; PPM - Gartner causes confusion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#38;nbsp      &laquo; PPM &#8211; Gartner causes confusion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

